Anyone can try to break it.
Few know where it actually breaks.
Attacks only find real weaknesses if the attacker knows the subject. Our red teams probe safety boundaries with calibration and rigour, not the randomness of a crowd.
From threat model to reproducible report.
We start from your policy and deployment context, and every finding ships with the exact steps to reproduce it.
- Threat modelYour policy, context, and real risks
- ProbeSpecialists attack with domain knowledge
- BreachA boundary gives way — the finding
- SeverityAn expert rates the real-world risk
- ReproduceExact steps, so your team can verify
- ReportPrioritised by what matters, under NDA
What we assess
What we probe for.
Every finding is severity-rated and ships with the exact steps to reproduce it.
Jailbreaks
Prompt-injection and instruction-override attempts built around your actual policy.
Safety boundaries
Refusal probing to find where the boundary sits versus where you intended it.
Policy violations
Harmful-output detection measured against your published standard.
Domain risk scenarios
Field-specific failure cases that only a subject-matter expert would think to try.
Edge-case discovery
Reproducible edge cases, documented so your team can verify each one.
Failure surfaces
Where the system degrades under adversarial pressure rather than failing cleanly.
How it runs
Attacks built around your policy, not a generic checklist.
A red team that does not understand your deployment context will find the obvious things and miss the ones that matter.
Threat modelling
We start from your policy, deployment context, and the risks that actually matter to you.
Expert probing
Domain specialists attack the system using knowledge a generic crowd worker doesn't have.
Severity rating
Every finding carries a clear severity so risk is prioritised, not just listed.
Reproducible reporting
Each issue ships with exact reproduction steps. Engagements run under NDA with project-level data segregation.
Who does the work
Red teaming is only as good as the attacker.
Red teaming depends entirely on who is doing the attacking. We staff engagements with specialists who understand both the domain and how systems fail in it.
- Security engineers
- Safety researchers
- Domain specialists
- Policy analysts
- Adversarial ML practitioners
- Legal and compliance reviewers
Find the failures before your users do.
Tell us your deployment context and safety policy. We'll build the threat model and assemble the right specialist team.